Comments on: Apache2/Mongrel vs. Apache1/FastCGI vs. Pound of Mongrels http://ckhsponge.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/apache2mongrel-vs-apache1fastcgi-vs-pound-of-mongrels/ Cool and hip stuff in your hood Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:02:22 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Chris Hobbs http://ckhsponge.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/apache2mongrel-vs-apache1fastcgi-vs-pound-of-mongrels/#comment-842 Chris Hobbs Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:11:05 +0000 http://ckhsponge.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/apache2mongrel-vs-apache1fastcgi-vs-pound-of-mongrels/#comment-842 Apache 2 with mongrels is setup #1 for these tests. On a side note, we are currently using Nginx with mongrels at Engine Yard. http://spongetech.wordpress.com/2007/06/04/layered-tech-vs-engine-yard/ Apache 2 with mongrels is setup #1 for these tests. On a side note, we are currently using Nginx with mongrels at Engine Yard.
http://spongetech.wordpress.com/2007/06/04/layered-tech-vs-engine-yard/

]]> By: Rohan http://ckhsponge.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/apache2mongrel-vs-apache1fastcgi-vs-pound-of-mongrels/#comment-841 Rohan Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:03:21 +0000 http://ckhsponge.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/apache2mongrel-vs-apache1fastcgi-vs-pound-of-mongrels/#comment-841 What about using apache 2.2 with mod_proxy_balancer sending the requests to mongrels? That's our current setup... What about using apache 2.2 with mod_proxy_balancer sending the requests to mongrels? That’s our current setup…

]]> By: James Thompson http://ckhsponge.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/apache2mongrel-vs-apache1fastcgi-vs-pound-of-mongrels/#comment-631 James Thompson Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:09:56 +0000 http://ckhsponge.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/apache2mongrel-vs-apache1fastcgi-vs-pound-of-mongrels/#comment-631 I only ever use FastCGI. Its not the new hotness but since I have servers that run PHP4, PHP5 and Rails all needing to coexist I have found that FastCGI gives me a good evnironment without any performance problems. Also, since FastCGI can be built right into Apache and LightTPD it keeps my stack nice and simple, no proxies, no multiple tiers at the application layer, nice and short. You definitely need to understand its configuration since it can present some funny errors and other bad behavior if you don't get the config right. I only ever use FastCGI. Its not the new hotness but since I have servers that run PHP4, PHP5 and Rails all needing to coexist I have found that FastCGI gives me a good evnironment without any performance problems.

Also, since FastCGI can be built right into Apache and LightTPD it keeps my stack nice and simple, no proxies, no multiple tiers at the application layer, nice and short.

You definitely need to understand its configuration since it can present some funny errors and other bad behavior if you don’t get the config right.

]]> By: links for 2007-08-11 « membo http://ckhsponge.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/apache2mongrel-vs-apache1fastcgi-vs-pound-of-mongrels/#comment-580 links for 2007-08-11 « membo Sat, 11 Aug 2007 08:25:24 +0000 http://ckhsponge.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/apache2mongrel-vs-apache1fastcgi-vs-pound-of-mongrels/#comment-580 [...] Apache2/Mongrel vs. Apache1/FastCGI vs. Pound of Mongrels « ckh sponge (tags: rails) [...] [...] Apache2/Mongrel vs. Apache1/FastCGI vs. Pound of Mongrels « ckh sponge (tags: rails) [...]

]]> By: Test http://ckhsponge.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/apache2mongrel-vs-apache1fastcgi-vs-pound-of-mongrels/#comment-123 Test Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:18:26 +0000 http://ckhsponge.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/apache2mongrel-vs-apache1fastcgi-vs-pound-of-mongrels/#comment-123 Hello G'night Hello

G’night

]]> By: Rick Martinez http://ckhsponge.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/apache2mongrel-vs-apache1fastcgi-vs-pound-of-mongrels/#comment-60 Rick Martinez Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:50:19 +0000 http://ckhsponge.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/apache2mongrel-vs-apache1fastcgi-vs-pound-of-mongrels/#comment-60 Can you post a sample of your Apache FastCGI config? Thanks! Can you post a sample of your Apache FastCGI config?

Thanks!

]]>